Is “The Miraculous Journey of Edward Tulane” a Christian Allegory?
Monday, January 29th, 2007Over at One-Minute Book Reviews, Janice Harayda wonders ” Did the crucifixion of a rabbit keep her from winning another Newbery Medal? “ She is talking about Kate DiCamillo’s excellent book, The Miraculous Journey of Edward Tulane. I don’t think so myself, but Janice Harayda does point out a lot of Christian symbolism and allegorical references that are in the book.
Now the illustration and description in the text of the rabbit tied to a cross as a scarecrow was really direct, and I caught that right away. However, she also points to a lot of evidence that this is a story where “Edward Tulane is a symbol of Christ, his story is a Passion narrative, and this novel is an allegory of Christian faith and resurrection.”
I’m reading this aloud at night with my family right now, and I have to admit that almost every argument she makes that this book is allegorical whooshed right by me. I think I may be convinced she is right. I suggest browsing over there to read what she has to say.
The reason I don’t think that this book won the Newberry is primarily because, as good as it is, I still don’t think that this book is up to the quality of DiCamillo’s best known books, “Because of Winn Dixie” or “The Tale of Despereaux“. Also, I’m not sure snubbing was deliberate; it was selected by the Midwest Bookseller’s Association for its top honor last fall, though they are probably less negative to Christian references than I suspect are ALA, the group that bestows the Newberry Awards. However, there may be other evidence that the ALA rejected the book on the basis of its overt Christian symbolism.
I have to say, based only on descriptions and reviews of this year’s winner, The Higher Power of Lucky by Susan Patron, I don’t have any strong desire to run out and read it. I’ll give it a try, but nothing I’ve read about it generates any real expectation of anything finding anything great. Of course, I hope I’m wrong.